Saturday, 20 February 2016

Kubrick, Part 1

Stanley Kubrick (1928-1999)

Among those whom I would call 'younger generation' Kubrick appears to me to be a giant. 
– Orson Welles


Watching a Kubrick film is like gazing up at a mountain top. You look up and wonder, "How could anyone have climbed that high?"
 – Martin Scorsese

Stanley Kubrick Series
Part 1 : Introduction

This may seem like an all-too-familiar story. A young kid who was not paying attention to school and having poor grades. Nothing really fascinated him in school, with the exception of chess and photography. When his grades meant that he could not be admitted to a university, he decided to go to evening courses, played chess to earn money in the park, and frequently visited the cinema. Sounds familiar, right? It is where the story starts to be unique. After serving as a staff photographer for some time, he earned a chance to enter the movie industry. He went on to make a couple of films. Often at the time of the release, some critics would castigate his films as ‘cold’, ‘detached’, ‘mechanical’, ‘wooden’ and even ‘misanthropic’. Yet, the nasty comments from these critics did not send these films to oblivion. Almost all these films have stood the test of time, and they have become modern classics. The images in these films have become so ingrained into modern culture that, you are likely to have encountered them before even knowing where these are all from. This great man has influenced so many subsequent filmmakers, and his spirit still loomed over in today’s cinema. He is my favorite filmmaker of all time – Stanley Kubrick (1928-1999) !!

Kubrick’s place in the movie universe

You may not have heard of Stanley Kubrick before, yet you are likely to be watched, to have heard of, or at least to be aware of any one of his films. 2001: A Space Odyssey. A Clockwork Orange. The Shining. Dr. Strangelove. Full Metal Jacket. Eyes Wide Shut. Spartacus. Lolita. Barry Lyndon. These are all powerful titles that do not require further descriptions. Kubrick has worked in many of the film genres, yet due to his originality, his films would almost always come out as the Number One in the genre or become the most iconic one in the respective genre.

Kubrick has influenced so many great filmmakers of today, including Steven  Spielberg, George Lucas, James Cameron, Ridley Scott, Martin Scorsese, Quentin Tarantino, the Coen Brothers, Christopher Nolan, David Fincher, Paul Thomas Anderson, Guillermo del Toro, Alfonso Cuarón and many more. These masters of cinema certainly know who they should look upon in order to pursue cinematic excellence.

Kubrick’s spirit still finds presence in many of today’s films. Fight Club, There Will Be Blood, No Country for Old Men, The Dark Knight, Avatar, Inception, Wall-E, Toy Story (indeed, most of Pixar movies), The Tree of Life, Gone Girl, Gravity, Interstellar, Mr. Robot – they are some of the most popular and well-regarded films of our era, and one thing in common for all – they are all somehow inspired by Kubrick’s style and ideas. Kubrick has passed away 17 years ago, yet we can still feel his power in so many facets of modern culture. Therefore, it is still totally relevant to discuss about Kubrick’s legacy nowadays.

The School of Kubrick is certainly well-established. Yet a more fascinating question may be – who and what influenced Kubrick in the first place? Kubrick’s many influences were all icons of modern cinema and art – Sergei M. Eisenstein, Max Ophüls (fluid camera movement), Charlie Chaplin, D. W. Griffith, Orson Welles (composition and camera style), Konstantin Stanislavsky (approach to actors), Bertolt Brecht (clinical detachment).  In terms of worldview, Kubrick was clearly influenced by Friedrich Nietzsche – to be honest, a number of his films can be considered the cinematic version of Nietzshe’s ideas, and thus they serve as great introductions to Nietzsche’s philosophy. He was also influenced by other titans like Charles Darwin, Sigmund Freud and Albert Camus.

Kubrickian Style

Kubrick’s films are iconic because they all follow a very consistent style. That means one can easily recognize the ‘Kubrickian’ elements from his various work. Kubrick almost adapted the screenplay from other sources in his major films, and he consistently made use of classical music in many of his films – from ‘Also Sprach Zarathustra’ and ‘The Blue Danube’ in ‘2001’ to Beethoven’s 9th symphony in ‘A Clockwork Orange’. He used consistent imageries and motifs in his films. Examples include parallel or duplicity elements in terms of imageries and also narrative, the symmetric and geometric perspective, and his iconic ‘Kubrick stare’. They are so memorable and lasting that subsequent film directors have ripped off all these elements numerous times. Kubrick believes in his original ideas, and he is a stunning filmmaker with a unique vision and style.

Theme 1 - The Dark Side

The 2 major themes of the Kubrick cinema can be summarized by ‘D & D’ - The Dark Side and Dehumanization. Most of Kubrick’s films are very dark, and very different from the subsequent filmmakers he has inspired. Kubrick’s films present a bleak and pessimistic view of human nature, and while they are highly popular -  just look at the number of the Kubrick films on the IMDB Top 250 - they are very different from the more positive and hopeful films like that of Spielberg, Lucas, Cameron and Scott. In a number of these films, like 2001, A Clockwork Orange and Path of Glory, they are also existential in nature. While Kubrick has no reservations to expose the worst moments of the human condition, he shows the audience that our dark sides come hand-in-hand with dehumanization and control.

Theme 2 - Dehumanization

Kubrick truly believes in Nietzschean freedom. Yet, he urges us to philosophize – what prevents us from being free, and hence makes us less human? Most of the key characters in Kubrick films are tragic figures, because they are somehow controlled or conditioned by some sort of authorities or forces they cannot escape. Be it conditioning, technology, paranoia, psychic, rules and customs, or even plain fatalism – these are the underlying powers that push the Kubrickian characters to their limits. Kubrick’s universe is a bit like that of Spinoza’s – it is a deterministic system that the characters find themselves to choose and find the right way. Yet, more than anything, Kubrick wishes to convince that the inability to choose freely is more likely due to authority’s control, which is often instrumental to selfish motives and will effectively wipe out the traces of human dignity.  Thus, no matter how dark or cold Kubrick films may appear, Kubrick is certainly not like this. Because, he simply shows he cares.

(1/2)

by Ed Law
20/2/2016

Film Analysis - 63