Sunday, 18 October 2015

Jeanne Dielman


40th Anniversary of 'JEANNE DIELMAN' (1975-2015)
After 40 years, the meat pie recipe still works great!!

'AN EPIC DRAMA OF DOMESTICITY' - E. L.

Two weeks ago, we were all saddened to hear the death of Chantal Akerman (1950-2015), who was possibly one of the most original and iconic female directors in the history of cinema. With her original vision on the human existence, she has made a number of iconic work throughout her 40 years of career. While most of these films may concentrate on a female perspective, they can be considered as timeless and are still of high relevance nowadays. Highly inspired by Jean-Luc Godard, she has been associated with the feminist avant-garde movement of the 1970s, and was also heavily involved in Experimental cinema. To me, Mme. Akerman’s work has a charisma and hypnotic effect that is hard to rationalize beyond reason. Somehow, she has a deep understanding of the way to make something truly cinematic. Of all of her great work, one film stands out due to its stunning originality. This film is a bit like Marmite – you either love it to an ecstatic level (like myself), or you hate it and label it as the most boring cinematic experience in this universe. That film is the masterpiece Mme. Akerman created when she was only 25 years old – ‘JEANNE DIELMAN’ (1975)!

Chantal Akerman (1950-2015)

Delphine Seyrig


Jeanne Dielman is such an iconic film character. She is the character who literally defines the word ‘feminine’ in cinema. Portrayed by the stunning Delphine Seyrig, who has appeared in iconic films like ‘Last Year At Marienbed’ and ‘The Discreet Charm of Bourgeoisie’, and also a director and an outright speaker for female rights, Jeanne Dielman is possibly her most memorable role in her career. Her wonderful and realistic portrayed of the middle-aged housewife is a performance that many audience can likely identify with. If the ‘domestic goddess’ has a name – it has to be ‘Jeanne Dielman’.

Jeanne Dielman and her son


The plot of the story is so simple, yet its simplicity is contrasted with the complex undertones hidden in every frame of the film. Jeanne Dielman is a widowed housewife who lives with her son in a middle-class environment. She is very ‘professional’ in the chores she needs to do as a housewife – cooking, cleaning, helping her son with homework etc. At the same time, she also moonlights (if that’s the right way to state it) as a prostitute for middle-aged or old men in the afternoon, when her son has not yet come back from school.

The film depicts, almost in real-time manner, 3 days of Mme. Dielman’s life. The first day, everything is working absolutely great, as if a mechanical clockwork is operating. However, at the second day, during her moonlighting ordeal in the afternoon, something rather unexpected has happened (spoiler). Things start to go wrong, which commences with the overcooking of her potatoes (yes it is THAT important for her). At the third day, all hell breaks loose for Mme. Dielman. Things are not going smooth or as planned, and the accumulation of all the stresses will eventually lead to an extremely shocking ending – which you have to watch it yourself...

For some reason, the kettles in Akerman's films have a hypnotic effect on me (just like in 'La Chambre'). I can't stop showing these.


The kettle in 'La Chambre'.


‘Jeanne Dielman’ is such a complex character study that one can apply numerous perspectives to appreciate it. I would say there is no way I will be able to access all these perspectives, and even more there is no way I will be able to understand this story from a female’s perspective. I hope what I can do here is to elaborate on those angles that I can observe from the film.

The film is considered as an important work in both feminist and anti-illusionist cinema, and Akerman’s background and influences have been able to contribute to these 2 fields through the film.

Akerman has been a practitioner of the ‘Feminist avant-garde’ movement of the 1970s. The whole point of the movement was to deconstruct the gender norms and also the patriarchal gaze so inherent in many of the major films. While the protagonist of ‘Jeanne Dielman’ is certainly a female, she is not portrayed in a Rita Hayworth style (disclaimer – I like Hayworth), which in a sense serves as a visual pleasure for the male audience. What Jeanne does in the film are the mundane work that a female will likely to encounter in the real world, therefore, as Akerman has put it, the film is a ‘phenomenal’ study of femininity,  or an exposition of the ‘female experience’.  Though, I have to add, the equal sex situation nowadays may make this film seem a bit dated, yet I suppose the experience perceived by Jeanne in the film is still highly identifiable by many of the contemporary audience.

The wonderful Chantal Akerman starring in 'La Chambre'.

 On the other hand, especially in the 1970s, Akerman’s style tends to be aiming towards anti-illusionism. The term is coined from the field of Art History, and it can also be nicely applied to Theatre or Experimental Cinema. Akerman creates a sort of heightened and detached feel in ‘Jeanne Dielman’, very much like the distanciation advocated by Brecht or the style in Godard’s film. As audience, we quietly observe Jeanne’s ordeal from a distance, but not in a voyeuristic manner like those films involving ‘female objects’. According to the film theorist Sitney, anti-illusionist cinema is often attributed to a number of key properties:

1. Fixed camera position / fixed framing
2. Flicker Effect
3. Loop printing
4. Rephotography

In the case of ‘Jeanne Dielman’, the first point is most relevant. The iconic style of the film is its extremely static framing. Not only the key action is recorded almost in real time (which suggests plenty of long takes), the camera position barely moves when the actions unfold. If the focus is on Jeanne, then in order to follow her action, the director should be using either tracking shot, or cuts to ‘catch up’ with her when she is moving in the cinematic space. This is NOT the case in the film. When Jeanne, for example, has to get something from a cupboard far away, instead of following her action, she simply walks off-screen – the camera still focuses on the static objects in the kitchen, and there are no significant camera movements. This is more than usual when you compare with most of the films involving, I suppose, human beings, right? ‘Jeanne Dielman’, in a sense, is the exploration of cinematic time.

Yet, it is certainly unfair to say the whole film takes place in real time, because Akerman did abstract out certain parts of the plot and presented them in an elliptic manner. The only sequences that are shown in real time are those involving the house work and chores, those which Akerman has considered as real ‘feminine experience’. Those scenes involving male audience’s visual pleasure, i.e. her moonlighting job, are shown in an elliptic manner. By the abstraction choice, Akerman allows the audience to confront the true nature of female existence, rather than an escapist cinema merely for entertainment.

Jeanne peeling potatoes. This is pure acting - Mme. Seyrig's finest hour.


The reason why Jeanne Dielman is such an iconic character is because she is mysterious and so ... strange. Akerman’s intention to make this film is to provide a critique on the ‘feminine existence’, and to show that the social norm can lead to a severe repression in their psyches. These sentiments are nicely demonstrated and executed by the great lady Delphine Seyrig, and she can totally capture the despair and helplessness so inherent in Jeanne Dielman.

Jeanne Dielman was a stoic-looking housewife. In the most part of the film, she has not shown any intense emotion, and she has not provided any heart-to-heart talk with any people around her, even with her son (remember how monotone she read a Baudelaire poem? ). When she was dealing with the different duties in the house, she was extremely focused and seemed to be able to reach all the tedious tasks in the most effective manner.  Her almost mechanical action, repetitive regimen showed the audience that she was entrapped in her role as a feminine. Jeanne Dielman’s timetable was always fully-booked – she has been able to fit something into every single time slot, and she would execute that task in a machine-like manner. Of course, when something starts to go wrong, the system known as Jeanne Dielman would fall apart...

Indeed, the genius of the role was that, with the minimal gesture and action, the maximum impact is instilled onto the audience. When Jeanne realized that she has unfortunately overcooked the potatoes for dinner, all the plans fell apart. The part when she was peeling the potatoes in real-time was monumental – with her facial expressions and gestures, audience could easily feel her frustrations of the failure. When she was making the meat pie the next day, she was literally overdoing it and venting her misery into the pile of minced meat. Things went absolutely berserk for Jeanne – not getting the usual seat in the coffee shop, not getting a button, not knowing what to reply to her sister in a letter. These are minor diversions of our life, but in Jeanne’s case, these were major blows to her coldly calculated schedule.   Jeanne was most vulnerable when her ‘planned’ actions were diverted, and she literally did not know what to do, or what else she could do, in those moments. A rather memorable scene was that when she has mis-managed something, she came to the sitting room and lied on the couch, feeling nervous and had no idea how to kill the spare time. She could not appreciate the many enjoyable aspects of human existence, as she was so entrapped in her identity. This is the existential despair of Jeanne Dielman, and if the audience can start to sympathize and raise questions about her, then the film has succeeded. And, to appreciate all these, you have to experience every single minute of this great film. 

Jeanne, after committing something beyond her belief



Rest in peace, Madame Chantal Akerman. Thank you for making such an iconic masterpiece!

by Ed Law
18/10/2015

Film Analysis - 61